Grand Manan Mayor Bonnie Morse had a pit at the bottom of her stomach the last few big storms.

During the winds that battered much of southern and central New Brunswick on Dec. 18, public wharves and private properties along Grand Manan’s developed eastern coast were swamped.

More recently, storm surges on Jan. 10 and 13 were exceptionally high, with even more seawater penetrating inland, eroding the banks and people’s yards.

“We saw some of the highest tides we’ve seen,” the mayor said. “We saw a lot of water on people’s properties and a lot of our harbours were underwater. We don’t normally see that during storms.”

The main road that cuts north-south along the eastern coast, Route 776, survived the battering but it has been a concern for years. The island’s pioneers preferred the area of the island that slopes gently to the water, not the sheer cliffs that dominate the western coastline.

The settlement pattern puts most of the roadways, homes and businesses in a vulnerable position, as global warming threatens to raise sea levels.

Route 776 ties all the communities on the island together, so if it were cut off, people on the wrong side would have to make do with their boats and ATVs.

“Anyone who lives on the coast is always worried about the big one hitting,” she said. “But certainly, seeing what we saw last week, makes us realize how vulnerable we can be during storms and it’s a pretty helpless feeling knowing there’s nothing you can do but wait to see how high the tide comes.”

Green Party Leader David Coon said Tuesday both Liberal and Progressive Conservative governments in New Brunswick have dilly-dallied too long on protecting shoreline properties and public infrastructure.

Besides Grand Manan, coastal properties in Saint Andrews and St. Stephen on the mainland in southwestern New Brunswick were battered by recent storms, which coincided with the high spring or “king” tide, the phenomenon when the earth, moon, and sun are in alignment.

“Nothing’s been done,” Coon said. “This government has abandoned people and left them to their own devices. So you have homeowners and municipalities trying to shore up shoreline. But it’s really a question of public works and infrastructure. There’s a public responsibility to safeguard people’s homes, properties and infrastructure. And this government isn’t doing that. They keep saying we’ll do that after completing a risk assessment. But later is too late for so many communities that are already experiencing the damage that’s being caused by erosion and storm surges.”

Provincial government officials did not respond to requests for interviews with Environment Minister Gary Crossman or Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Richard Ames.

Instead, they released a prepared statement.

“Climate change will continue to impact every part of society, from infrastructure to our health to our natural environment,” wrote spokeswoman Clarissa Andersen. “To address these effects, a thorough, evidence-based strategy will need to be established through the assessment.”

Andersen said that the province’s climate change action plan committed to doing a risk assessment by 2025, followed by an adaptation plan to respond to the identified risks.

Work on the risk assessment, she said, had already begun and was on track to be released next year.

She added that the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure (DTI) understood the importance of taking swift and decisive action to reduce the impact of climate change.

“DTI also understands that climate conditions have changed since the construction of much of our infrastructure and are seeing its impacts,” she wrote. “The safety of New Brunswickers is of the utmost importance to DTI and the department continues to investigate and pursue federal funding opportunities to advance climate action in the province.”

New Brunswick has 5,500 kilometres of coastline and dozens of rivers, with many areas susceptible to flooding and erosion. Bolstering these areas or retreating from them would likely cost billions, in a province with an annual capital budget of just $1 billion.