The Nigerian government is negotiating with local communities to resume oil production in a region previously affected by environmental damage. This follows Shell’s sale of its onshore business in Nigeria. The $2.4 billion transaction was confirmed by Olu Verheijen, Nigeria’s special advisor on energy. This sale marks the end of Shell’s nearly 100-year operations in the Niger Delta, an area plagued by environmental pollution complaints.

Shell’s exit from the onshore Niger Delta is part of a broader trend among Western oil companies. Firms like ExxonMobil, Eni, Equinor, and TotalEnergies are also reducing their presence in Nigeria. These companies are shifting their focus offshore to avoid the challenges posed by oil spills and violence in the Delta region. The environmental impact of oil production has been a longstanding issue, with spills contaminating rivers and farmland.

Scientific studies have highlighted significant contamination in the Niger Delta. High levels of chemical compounds from crude oil and heavy metals have been detected. These pollutants have severely affected water sources for local communities. Despite efforts to clean up the region, including a United Nations Environment Programme-advised exercise funded by Shell, mismanagement issues persist. In Ogoniland, where Shell ceased operations in 1993 due to protests over environmental damage and human rights abuses, there is potential for restarting production. Government officials see this as a way to boost foreign exchange earnings. Ledum Mitee, an environmental activist, stated that there is broad support in Ogoni for resuming production.

Activists demand more dialogue before any oil production resumes in Ogoniland. They appreciate the president’s approach of consulting with local communities rather than imposing solutions. Mitee emphasized the importance of these consultations to ensure fair terms and conditions for resuming production.

The sale of Shell’s onshore assets faced delays due to protests from communities and activist groups like Amnesty International. These groups insisted that Shell should first address the environmental damage it caused. The terms of how this damage will be addressed remain undisclosed. Isaac Botti from Social Action, a Nigerian group opposing Shell’s sale, sought details of the agreement between Shell, Renaissance Africa Energy Company, and the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission. However, there has been no response from the regulator regarding these requests. Shell has stated that its transaction aims to maintain its role in conducting remediation where past spills occurred during joint venture operations. However, concerns about effective cleanup remain high among local communities and activists.

The situation in Nigeria highlights ongoing challenges related to oil production and environmental management. As Western companies retreat from onshore operations, the focus shifts to ensuring responsible practices and addressing past damages effectively.